The Trait Anger

Introduction Characteristic anger studies have generated various definitions. One of the most common definitions is to call out the anger of a characteristic as a trend to observe some situations. This is irritating and often angry. The anger to the emotion itself is defined as "a basic feeling that most people experience unnecessary and unexpected behaviors of others" (Tafrate, Kassinove, Dundin, 2002, p. 1573). There is a clear consensus that emotional anger is often the most common.

Characteristic anger is explained as individual emotional trends experiencing long-term anger over time and beyond the context (Spielberger, Jacobs, Russel, & Crane, 1983). People with characteristics and anger tend to feel stronger anger in various situations due to their temperament and are more often the result of negative evaluation in various situations (Fox & Spector, 1999, Spielberger et al., 1983). Characteristic anger also represents a tendency to treat the situation as irritating, irritating or provocative and dealing with higher anger (Spector, 2003; Spielberger, 1999). People with anger and anger often feel that they are unjustly treated by others and may suffer a lot of frustration. In addition, the high character of the individuals of angry individuals' anger experiences the anger of the nation more frequently and more strongly

The anger and negative emotions of characteristics are personal behavior, which refers to permanent personality characteristics. These include distinct anger, age and gender, and alcohol abuse. These plays an important role in the offensive nature of the workplace. If anger is not properly managed, people can get caught up in intense debate and lead to attacks and other disadvantaged attitudes. Personal and contextual prediction of the frustration of work The frustration of work can be caused by several factors that can be categorized as situation factors or personal factors.

Fox and Spector (199) examined the relationship between the anger of the traits and the bias of the workplace in one study. These authors discover that characteristic anger is closely related to context prejudice, source of control, anxiety rather than workplace prejudice, and when departure happens job satisfaction and frustration are punishment Feel the possibility. Therefore, people with characteristic anger may respond to insensitive and unfair treatment in an organization deviating from the workplace. Watson and Clark (1984) defined a negative activity (NA) as a higher-order personality variable, a painful emotional level with how much experience a person (such as frequency and intensity), anger, Hostility, fear, anxiety. Studies that are frequently measured on an "emotional" scale have shown that people with high NA are more likely to experience negative emotions in different situations, regardless of specific stimuli (Watson and Clark, 1984).