The Town of Greece versus Respondent Galloway

The Greek town is a municipality with government authority, located in Monroe County, New York. The Greek city council holds a meeting once a month, judging the average situation of the city, such as voting for local governments' laws and regulations, special town approval, respect for citizens, and oaths to related employees I will. The Greek Town Council consists of five members representing approximately 94,000 inhabitants. In 1999, John Oberger, then head of the Greek town, began practicing to welcome local churches to pray before each town council meeting started.

In the Greek town versus Galloway case, the Supreme Court 's five conservatives awarded that the legislative meeting of the town council meeting could be opened through clear sectarian prayers. The town council almost instantly began calling Christians to speak at their gathering, but excluding speakers of minority believers (and of course atheists). In the short term, the ambiguous vision of the majority of tolerance to Galloway's numerous citizens is beginning to look like government support for Christianity and a few religious sacrifices. For conservatives in the Roberts Court, "religious freedom" means increasingly religious majority forcing their religious beliefs against freedom of others. Speaking of this

In the Greek town vs. Galloway incident (12-696), the Supreme Court will hear about the case that the prayers of the town councils were allowed to lead prayers by various beliefs or whether they could become mainly Christians I agree. May 5, 2014, the US Supreme Court, 5-4 support the Greek town, the US Constitution permits prayers at government meetings, as well as religious prayers such as the main Christian prayers We also decided to support.

Greece vs. Galloway's lawsuit has an ethical problem. On May 5, 2014, the Edge Split Supreme Court adopted a decision against Greece vs. Galloway. Judge Kennedy believes that most of the five judges believe that town prayer practices do not violate this provision. Therefore, various judges are expressing opinions on the incident. Regarding the issue of this particular incident, the Supreme Court did not consider whether there was a support test that led to discussions in the field of religious prayer by government funds. The problem is that there was no clear definition of approval until Okonor Justice introduced the concept of approval with Lynch, until she left the court immediately after the Ten Commandments (2005).