Before exploring deeply how to expose them through tortilla's theme and satirical writing, you should first explore this work is not an ironic argument. Tortilla Curtain is an illegal immigration issue explaining the wealthy couple living in a close community, Mossbachers, and the two families of Rincon illegal immigrants who live in the valley near the house of Mossbacher. Boyle may argue that by depicting the Moorsbach people in such harsh lights, they attacked people who are racist and less susceptible to illegal immigration. But publications are not sarcastic. It is simply because it shows a factor that attacks something and has an adverse effect on society. In addition, as mentioned above, Mosbacher is considered insensitive and ignorant, and their hypocrisy may be ironic. However, works containing satirical elements do not necessarily claim that the work is a satirical work.
Then, how can you say that tortillas are not just sarcastic, but effective irony? The answer can be found in the previous discussion that work is not sarcastic. Let's first look at the first explanation of the dictionary definition. Webster believes that satire is "a literary work that prevents human malice and stupid absurdity and absurd things" (Agnes 551). Do not you think that ridiculous things are attacking something stupid? There are many examples of "tortillas" where writers attack racial discrimination and oppose immigrants. He does this by describing Mos Buckers in the harsh and critical light, and there are many foolish acts that are insensitive. For example, when Delaney Mossbacher hit Candido Rincon with his car, he did not call a doctor or ask for help. Candido has neither medical care nor worry. No, what draenei can do is just give Candido $ 20. Yes, draenei has some guilt, but it's only for a while.