Leaders are different if the situation is different. Regardless of the situation, the leader meets the needs of others. The captain of the baseball team is ready to lead a group of baseball players, but for different circumstances requiring different characteristics of leaders it is impossible to lead a group of warriors to battle. To become a great leader, leaders must recognize that they are leaders and who they are. In addition, the leaders must recognize what type of leaders they are. Learn about the style of leadership: We will study the style of leadership in Lewin: authoritarian, democratic or laisparty, development and application of superior leadership skills to be effectively effective leader .
As the political regime was different in the US and Germany before the Second World War, research on leadership was urged to evaluate the three leadership styles of authoritarianism, democracy, and free laissez. In democratic leadership style, decisions are made by majority vote; equal participation is encouraged; criticism and punishment are minimal. Among the authoritarian leaders, the leader must make all decisions and the others must strictly follow the established procedures. Among the freelance instructors, the actual leadership is small, others are allowed to work and play as usual without proper instruction.
In addition to the free-firing principle leadership, there are three other major leadership styles, but in fact, most managers use all four types of combinations. The other three leadership styles are democracy (or participation), dictatorship (or dictatorship), and fatherhood. Each management approach has advantages and disadvantages. So a good manager builds a balanced approach combining all these four approaches. Democratic leaders resemble freer-laisad leaders who give up power and allow men to make decisions. Freestanding leaders often give full control to employees, whereas democratic leaders still lead the team to leave and lead the team members' ideas like regular moderators.
There are three styles of leadership. The first style of leadership is an authoritarian style. According to Awan (2010, pp. 253 - 266), authoritarian leaders made independent decisions to rule over other team members "to achieve a single goal". The second style is democratic. This style of leadership encourages and enables team members to apply based on what is relevant to work, but team leaders always make final decisions (Robbins 2011, pp. 297-299). The third style of leadership is Laissez-Faire style. According to Van (2004, pp. 1-13), the leader of Laissez-Faire Style can not manage the members of the organization, so the organization can decide completely and freely.