Due to continuous technological innovation, the concept of science and technology in the United States is constantly fluctuating. The fact that the image of science and technology in the United States is rising is due to the latest advances in science and technology, whether there is a negative influence or not. In times like war, technology essentially determines the outcome, the citizen's perception of technology becomes important, and the implementation of technology becomes decisive. Many other factors are related to determining how the public perceives science and technology.
Peres defines the technical revolution as a series of interrelated fundamental breakthroughs, a single innovation that forms a series of interdependent technologies. In other words, the technical revolution is a system gathering, or a system of innovation systems. For example, recent advances in information technology have created a technical system centered on microprocessors and other integrated semiconductors and have opened up new technologies of personal computers, software, telecommunications and the Internet. Later, these new technical systems created strong interdependence and feedback between technology and market.
But is AI really the next major innovation? Is there a general structure of historically identifiable technological revolution? If so, is the insight of the previous technology revolution applicable to AI? If artificial intelligence represents a major technical advance comparable to electricity and steam, at what stage are we developing now? Socioeconomist Carlota Perez tracks the discontinuity and regularity in the innovation process in her research on economics of innovation and technology change. Similar to Thomas Kuhn's study of the essence of scientific discovery - the scientific revolution weakened the scientific process and caused the formation of a new scientific paradigm - Perez is a series of technological revolution that disrupts our industry And the "technical economic paradigm". And society