The Systematic Destruction of the Native American Nations in the 1830's

In the 1830 's, the US government decided to move the Native American people to the western territory of the Mississippi River. Reason why Native Americans must move The government raised many reasons. Those tribes who did not act voluntarily were forcibly removed from the land of their ancestors. This mandatory action was later called "tear mark". The US government has proposed a number of reasons why Native Americans need to travel west of the Mississippi River. Many East Asians believe this will protect native American culture 1 Many Indians try to integrate into white culture to stay on their ancestral land 2 But pioneers do not like me.

In the 1830 's there was a big difference between American white Americans. In exchange with Native Americans, the first white settlers adopted policies shaped by their European worldview and experience. When the United States became a country, a new government was founded on this European foundation, but among them the Native American policy changed perception and needs - primarily more land and wealth desire. After all, Native Americans are seen as era-anomalous barbarians in the western part of Appalachia, and eastern philanthropists and humanitarians can exchange for barbarians.

From 1783 to 1830, the policy of the American Indians is to control the people of the Native Americans and to establish their legitimacy and authority by establishing an orderly and prosperous white settlement within the mainland, a new American national state It reflected the desire of. . Federalists have focused on protecting Indian claims and attacking several protected white settlements (Ohio, Kentucky, Tennessee), often founded intensely during the Revolutionary War. They used this treaty to establish the legal boundary between these protected areas and the Indian community and made it possible for Indians to stand on their side with pensions and military strength. Genotype Republicans adopted a broader development plan, promoting native American dependence. The Treaty Committee convinced the prime minister to give up the servitude of the road and the river bank region, and the government developed it by connecting the residential areas of the scattered white people.

Due to the establishment of the indigenous peoples' response elimination bill, indigenous peoples have four choices. State jurisdiction, removal, litigation, or battle. In the 1930s, courses vary by country. Creek, Chicasso, Choctaw, and many tribes in northern Greece have agreed to reluctantly dismiss. Their principal, Cherokee led by John Ross, questioned the Georgia State Expansion Law in federal courts. In the Worcester Georgia case in Georgia (1832), the US Supreme Court declared that Cherokee is a sovereign state and the expanding law of Georgia State is unconstitutional. However, Jackson did not make a decision on the state. The Cherokee National Assembly continued to refuse to sign the return treaty, but in 1835 the opposition group signed a notorious new Ecota Treaty. Western part. Military resistance also failed