The Success of Twelve Angry Men as a Thriller

Despite the limit of twelve angry people "movie 12 angry people" as a thriller's success, it is a thrilling thriller. There are many restrictions on this film, but black and white film in 1957 was filled with doubts. These restrictions are scenes, action / effects, props, lack of clothes, actors are 12 middle-aged unattractive white people, and the final movie plot is pretty boring and boring. Regardless of these restrictions, director Sidney Rumet still creates an exciting thriller by concentrating the movie on an interesting and memorable character with different personality and background.

Despite the limit of twelve angry people "movie 12 angry people" as a thriller's success, it is a thrilling thriller. There are many restrictions on this film, but black and white film in 1957 was filled with doubts. These restrictions are scenes, action / effects, props, lack of clothes, actors are 12 middle-aged unattractive white people, and the final movie plot is pretty boring and boring. - Reginald Rose's "Twelve Angry Men" and "Twelve Angry Men" are screenplays of 12 juries in an uncomfortable room. They had to argue about the case of life and death of a boy who accused or killed his father. The juries do not actually know each other, they want them somewhere in the jury. Each jury has a different emotional pattern that makes the play interesting. In my opinion, the jury has mainly three juries: a jury 8, a jury 3, a jury 9

Reginald Rose 's "Twelve Angry Men" tension is scheduled in New York in the summer of 1957. A juvenile offender was tried, and stabbed his violent father's breast with a unique knife. In the absence of reasonable doubt, the judge will order the jury, consisting of 12 men, to vote for guilty. In voting: 11 votes are guilty, but some believe that it is necessary to discuss the bad guilt of the boy and the ambiguity of the evidence provided. - The jury # 1 initially thought that the boy was guilty. He is convinced that the evidence is sufficient to convict the boy. He kept on thinking until the jury first voted and saw one of the jurors thought the boy was innocent. Then through the movie, all the juries slowly believed that the boy was not guilty. The rhetorical charm he used for the first time was the logo. He convicted based on the logic provided by the court.