The strongest argument against same-sex marriage: traditional marriage is in the public interest

Voters and legislators in each state should be able to enact their own laws, as opponents of same-sex marriage think that individual countries will promote relationships between opposite sex through marriage policy for public benefit.

Several groups like American Catholic bishops cited quotes the long-term interests of gay marriages, in particular gay couples' ability to replicate, as reported by Daniel Siriman in the Washington Post I will.

Bishop stated in court fellows as follows: "It is wrong to define a marriage as a combination of men and women, in some sense embodying a purely religious point of view rather than a purely secular point of view." This is because homosexual relationships are the birth of children , Or the common sense that a child will not lead to a family whose child is raised by a mother and father born. "

Tony Perkins, the chairman of the Family Research Committee, waits for remarks near the Supreme Court. (Drew Angerer / Getty Images)

Other groups such as the Conservative Family Research Council warned that allowing a same-sex couples to marry will lead to the collapse of traditional families. As a friend of the court, the FRC maintains a couple's relationship with a homosexual couple and states that the state allowed "to guide the potential birth behavior of heterosexual couples into a stable relationship that mothers and fathers can nurture" It was.

In order to defend the same-sex marriage, opponents need to persuade the court to encourage the state to concern the encouragement of homosexual relations, rather than truly discriminating between same-sex couples.

However, most Supreme Court judges and most lower courts deny this claim broadly, and we believe that prohibitions on same-sex marriage are discriminatory and illegal.

Discussion on same-sex marriage focuses on four themes: (1) Gay marriage violates customs, traditions, or nature; (2) this is a true meaning or distortion of marriage, (3) Because homosexuality is wrong, refusal (4) The result of allowing gay marriage is dangerous or harmful. Supporters generally believe that (1) admitting same-sex marriage is a matter of justice, requiring equal treatment and equal opportunity, or (2) accepting homosexuality and society as a whole.

There are few objections to same-sex marriage, most of which are based on emotional or religious beliefs and traditions. One objection to gay marriage is that marriage is not an individual involved but should be used for childbirth. This belief has a strong foundation in Christian religion. As Jean Elshtain wrote in Commonweal magazine, "There was never a marriage about two people - never happening - it's about the possibilities of childbirth" (59). There was a controversy as to whether or not to pass DOMA before the House passed DOMA. Supporters of DOMA are trying to force this problem by expressing gays as "immoral, inappropriate, and unnatural" (Dority 39). This discussion is based on opinion and it is totally illegal because there is no scientific support to support such statements.

Some people are seeking traditional opposition to gay marriage. Others argue that this is a waiver of the true meaning of marriage and hence against it. Marriage is for child birth and child rearing, but same sex couples are infertile. The main objection is that marriage has multiple purposes. In addition to birth, homosexual couples can participate in these and heterosexual couples can participate.