I. Introduction Recently, under the sea, the outline plan issued by Baclapu and Suroban caused strong opposition from the community. Due to the lack of housing supply and the growing awareness of the protection of the public, the public has linked this plan to unfair small-scale housing policies. . In this regard, I would like to point out that some important issues in small-scale housing policies are contradictory views among different stakeholders.
Last year, California began to move from housing security policy to housing priority policy. Due to poor housing policy over half a century, we aimed to make housing creation incredibly expensive. However, despite last year's exciting housing package - my housing rationalization bill, 15 powerful housing fees including SB 35, there are still many things to do. It is the future. Whether in the busy city center, in the suburbs or rural areas, California people need better access to the houses. Housing shortage in California is throughout the state - too many people suffer from housing costs - state-wide housing solutions are needed
You are following this little question. Anti-poverty policy and anti-black policy, and recent immigration prevention policies have dominated housing policies in the SF, Los Angeles, and other parts of California for decades. Its purpose is to drive "unwelcome people" out of the main area and this approach is to increase housing costs by creating artificial shortages. Huge capital gains obtained by people who entered early as "qualified people" are not allowed. This is the real story of how it works. My oldest and beloved friend bought two lots. One for Carmel for his daughter and the other for his son in Minneapolis. He built a house for everyone. In Minneapolis, the license acquisition process took one month and the cost was less than a tenth; in Carmel it took about two years to spend more than $ 200. The Minneapolis house was completed on a budget within 6 months. Carmel's house takes 18 months to complete, 50% above the budget
Beyond the house, but this is not where it ends. What we saw in the budget response speech of opposition leaders a few months ago is a new limitation of SME policy. The Labor Party is currently talking about a 5% tax cut on SMEs. The Prime Minister quickly lifted the idea, but according to the past, I will come back with him and a very enthusiastic Minister of Small and Medium Enterprises will use this as their own idea at the right time. Finally, I'd like to tell you about the specific policies related to small and medium enterprises are good, but the smallest companies most need is the prosperous Australian economy with confident consumers. During the term of the two-year term to the government, they say that they have done their utmost to break the trust of the country's economy and consumer confidence. Discussion was interrupted