The slippery slope

Discussion of landslide is not another decision but a potential beginning of the trend

In general, this argument says that if you allow relatively harmless things today, you may start to tend to lead to things you can not imagine at the moment.

Discussion of landslides is used to discuss euthanasia and similar topics. For example, people are worried that as soon as spontaneous euthanasia is legalized, involuntary euthanasia begins to occur immediately.

Discussion of landslides is often considered a logical error - this is an academic paper detailing the reasons. TL; DR version is a landslide parameter assuming that we can not tell different things. For example, people who oppose same-sex marriage often rely on this strategy, claiming that their legalization leads to passionate marriage, close relatives, or the legalization of marriage between men and animals. However, each of these matters is different from each other and from gay marriage, each of which can be considered separately (and in some cases lacking) based on its own strengths. The landslide argument is a logical mistake because it tries to shift the controversy from another (a legalized homosexual relationship) to another more unpleasant or frightening (legalization of legalized behavior) .

The landslide is behind schedule. "Errors in landslides can occur from benign premises or departures at first glance to several imperceptible limits through several small steps." In the context of this discussion, this sounds like this: 'Or' If you correct this error, it will fix all other errors immediately. At this point, what will be the next thing that will allow users to access their funds?