The Sisters of Charity and their Service in the Civil War

Charity sisters and their service in Lincoln 's inaugural speech on March 4, 1861 claimed that the alliance could not be dissolved by separation (34 wards). On April 12, 1861, the first shot was shot at Samput, so the civil war started in the United States. In April 1865, Grant and Lee gathered at the Appomattox Court, handed the Confederate Confederation, and the civil war was officially concluded. In the four-year confrontation between these dates, our country died of 600,000 deaths and illnesses.

After the civil war ended, philanthropy and philanthropy increased. Charitable organizations are beginning to be interested in philanthropy as a science to control what they believe is not wise. Science philanthropists believe in social Darwinism and believe that there are social problems because poor people are not as good as rich. They insist on close supervision and guidance to poor people to help them improve themselves (ibid). Andrew Carnegie and John D. Rockefeller believe that liability for unfortunate things comes from wealth. They have laid the foundation for managing wealth throughout their lives. They encourage other very wealthy people to follow their example. This is the turning point of America's social contribution because it increases the number of foundations and leads to specialization of social contribution. During the First World War, as the technique of raising funds improved, this professionalism also improved.

In the late nineteenth century, a civil war brought about new demands for charity projects. Charity projects provide supplies and services to units to help morale of civilians. The Women's Organization Assistance Association supports soldiers and their families. North-South religious groups are trying to provide moral guidance and spiritual consideration to units (ibid). After the civil war ended, philanthropy and philanthropy increased. Charitable organizations are beginning to be interested in philanthropy as a science to control what they believe is not wise. Science philanthropists believe in social Darwinism and believe that there are social problems because poor people are not as good as rich. They insist on close supervision and guidance to the poor to help them improve themselves (ibid)