The Seperation of Genesis

In the academic world, I generally think that there are two creative stories in Genesis. The first creation story is done in Genesis 1 and the second story is done in Genesis scholars. . Since the first one relates to the ancient Israeli priesthood, it is called the Priestly (P) account and the author of J always calls the Creator Lord so it is called the Jahwist (J) account. Genesis 1-2.3 introduces P account.

Under this assumption, it is clear that Genesis may have two different creative explanations. Both Gordon J. Wenham and Bruce K. Walthke both agree that Genesis 1 is a preamble. Also, Whyham suggests the late addition of Genesis. In examining these differences and similarities, the parallelism and contrast created by Babylon / Sumer tend to concentrate on Genesis 1, and the parallelism and contrast of Egypt are classified in Genesis 2: 4 I understand this. At the end of chapter 3 they show that they are two separate units designed to resolve each myth system alone

What is the difference between the explanation of the creation of Genesis at the time and other creative stories? [Close]

Genesis stated that "God created mankind in his own image." If God is speech, God created mankind with his own image, words and languages ​​are sacred sparks that divide humans from animals, and refuted Darwin 's theory of evolution. Darwin and his supporters did not try to explain how speech and language were born and evolved. In 1872, the London Language Institute ceased accepting papers on this issue until the 1950s when attractive young linguists named Noam Chomsky adopted linguistics as topics. Scientists abandoned. Chomsky writes over 150 books, but I can not count how many articles, but I have never responded to criticism about the origin of language in Darwin. In 2014, eight famous scientists, including Noam Chomsky, published a paper titled "Mystery of Language Evolution."

Golden lie: how sex and deception promote human evolution, civilization and 2016 presidential election