In the scientific community of many famous biologists, intense debate is intensely quarreling. To this day there are people who support this theory and some believe there are fatal flaws.
As evolutionary adaptability is measured by passing genes to the next generation, Dawkins believes that each gene will work in such a way that it is the best opportunity to be replicated and handed down to the next generation.
Those who object to the theory point out that individual genes can not control self-behavior as they can not control the behavior of living organisms.
Altruism is defined as an act that does not benefit individuals who do it. There are several kinds of people living together, but their way of acting is selfless
The most extreme example is that in social animals individuals give up the right to copy to grow offspring of the Queen. In order to explain this the theory of relative selection was developed. At the time, the only known social animals were haploid Diptera insects (wasps and bees).
In haploid diploid species, fertilized egg develops uniquely and fertilized egg develops to homosexuality. In the case of hymnopterans, the unfertilized egg becomes a man, the fertilized egg becomes a woman, and there is a stronger relationship between women in the group.
This theory believes that closely related individuals are likely to have the same gene and thereby help to pass these same genes to descendants.
Since then, sociality has been found in several species, not all species are haploid. Although the selection of relatives may still play a role in social nature, it has been removed to a more supportive role than the main reason behind social evolution.
The reasons for altruism and social nature are still controversial in the living world. In order to extend this function to future generations, some kind of goodness of fit is required. The question is what value altruism brings to living things.
Scientists continue to work on the interpretation of numbers and the traditional framework. This discussion has also created great interest in fields such as social biology and psychology, as one of many species showing sociality and altruism is humanity.
The BBC article explains the altruistic 'selfish' genetic theory - our idea is to obtain chemical topics results by helping people who share our genes. Especially relatives. If you can help those who generally seem to have more genetic material than you personally, you will get help if you pay for it. From a genetic point of view it enhances the overall "comprehensive adaptability" of your shared genes, so it is not selfless altruism, but for some (not one) direct family members your Building a life is wise self-interest. Reproductive opportunities). There are even equations (Hamilton's law) that predicts when people will help (or not) based on (apparent) shared genes.
Dawkins explains that selfish genes are also subtle genes. The world of selfish genetics develops mainly in barbaric competition, ruthless exploitation, fraud, but Dawkins believes clear altruistic behavior exists in nature. For example, when a bee crouching to protect a nest box, they committed suicide and the birds endanger their lives to warn the eagle to come. Rockefeller was a gorgeous, born unmarried snake oil salesman and a son of a godly and stubborn mother who built the most wealthy man from the world from the world by creating America's most powerful and scary monopoly . This trust, known as "octopus" by many gangsters, refines and sells nearly 90% of the US oil production.
Mr. Dawkins said that the "purpose" of his "selfish gesture" is "testing biology of egoism and altruism." To support this, he did so in favor of "self-centeredness of genes often leads to self-centeredity of personal behavior." At the level of individual animals. "Gene selection means that the organism" helps "by explaining about the selection and social nature of the relatives that serve the individual's interest (in terms of health, safety, or individual breeding), ie by helping the gene proliferate the genes to which it relates It will provide a discussion that succeeds. Copies of its own copy (or sequences with the same phenotypic effect) claiming that these "selfish" behavior of genes leads to non-selfish behavior of the organism