Many dynasties and kingdoms dominated what we now call the Middle East. In almost every society, rulers are wealthy, educated, specific races or ethnic groups. These positions are usually obtained through civil war or by overthrowing the powers of the previous administration. Even though Muhammad Ali was the dominant elite from the end of the 11th century to the middle of the 19th century, he can shape the direction and development of nations and territories in three different ways, social, economic and political It was.
All contacts are provided to provide a historical basis for understanding current events. Separation of churches / mosques from the state, corruption / elite, tradition of the rule of law, and why India, China, the Middle East, and the place like the West originated from different ideas based on the development of the millennium regime. Sometimes you want him not to go into detail, but at the same time it brings solemnity to the whole story that is difficult to discuss. (The reader of the "Hello effect" will be ridiculous of the choice that only the depth of research necessarily justifies the formation of the theory.) Fun as described in "Our era" I guess. Broader background
If a war occurs in the Middle East, there will be three sets of losers: the public, the middle class and the ruling class. Most of the 218 million people in the Middle East will lose their income and lose their families to participate in the Middle East war, of which 10% will become radical and will be in power during the period of control. Families seem to be numbered. The powerless power of Vaclav Havel is related to this - the Middle East war between nations will soon evolve into a war between 99% and 1% - this is a war in which Israel and Saudi Arabia certainly fail, It is necessary for religious families in Egypt, Jordan, Saudi Arabia to pass by.