The abstract rule of Matthew Corlings is an exhilarating clock. Artists and critics began his 90-minute show, going back to the history of abstract art and returning to the charming Helena Brabatsky wisdom movement in the 19th century. From here, he turned to the colors and shapes of Kandinsky, Pollock, Rothko etc. As they made new abstract works through the process, there was an interview with studio interviews and working artists
Collings' talent is very similar to going to a new city gallery with knowledgeable friends on a sunny day on his show. For a long time we have been allowed to see a lot of beautiful and incomprehensible art and Collings gently urges you to stand in the corner of the frame and keep your mind open.
In a word, he resisted the temptation of the chin. Shiny beard must be temptation fierce
Indeed, when we last saw the art show host Matthew Collings at BBC 4, he clung to mathematical equations. But he returned to the 90-minute introduction book "Abstract Rule" (BBC 4 at 10 pm) of B. anthracis, put his beard aside and showed Bain Off Iain like a shadow of 5 o'clock. In addition to Shoreditch's sarcasm, it reminds me of when Saddam Hussein was captured by the US Army in Tikrit's hole. For a long time she has created complex geometric flaws with partner Emma Biggs (she made this color, but in most cases he has applied it already Do not be afraid of people's smears, do not be afraid of "being something you have to get used to" or "everything is perception." Later he said that "everything is superficial." I think that it depends on the "all" you talk.
BBC's documentary "Abstract Rule" covers the emergence of abstract art in the last century. Matthew Collings examined the problem of how it responds to abstract art when seeing abstract art. Is it difficult to understand with mysterious meanings or symbols, or is it easy to understand? If I did not get it, was I stupid? What does this mean? Is there an intention or meaning when the artist scatters on the canvas or draws a picture?