In the introduction of Cuvier, he discusses the nature of natural science, "Influence everyone in all parts" (Cuvier, 4). Cubier can prove that natural history is an indispensable part of natural philosophy and it is possible to clarify the laws of nature. In suggesting this claim, Cubier argues that natural history plays an equally scientific role in revealing the natural science system compared to more empirical methods such as dynamics and chemistry There.
Galileo Galilei (1564-1642) played an important role in the history of science, in the philosophical history of many, if not at the heart of the 17th century scientific revolution. Research in his physics or natural philosophy, astronomy and scientific methodology still causes controversy more than 400 years later. His role in promoting Copernicus' s theory, and the sufferings and trials of the Roman Church is a story that needs to be reworked. This article attempts to outline these aspects of Galileo's life and work, but accomplishes this by focusing on his argument about the nature of matter in a new way.
How will our understanding and recognition of history change with time? How is the role of history in society evolving? How has the nature of history changed (for example, various forms of humanities)? What is the relationship between today's humanities and past science? (In the words of Newton, are they standing on the shoulder of the giant?
We only know one science, historical science. People can see history from two perspectives and divide it into natural history and human history. However, both can not be distinguished, natural history and human history will depend on each other as long as there are human beings. Natural history, which is known as the natural sciences here does not care about us, but nearly the whole ideology is a distorted concept of this history or a complete abstraction of it, so do not investigate the history of humanity There is no doubt. The ideology itself is only a part of this history.