The Road of Censorship

Review review violated our initial right to freedom of expression. This is done by suppressing information on books, magazines, and other publications, as Burger said, censorship is to control communication among people. Restrictions on books, newspapers, magazines, what you can do with movies and television, and what you can say with speech and broadcast. In most cases, the government has adopted the censorship system, but religious groups and special interest groups also try to manage the flow of information.

As soon as we start our review journey, we will be destined to fail. For all of these, complaints are faced by some politicians seeking to benefit from some groups, or the general public who loses more reasons their emotions express their rights I need a person who is willing to complain and say. If you start this road, who will be the reviewer? What about the review? Is it based on power? We live in 350 million countries, but we can not agree on which fast food restaurants match best. How can I set the criteria for accepting speech? Attempts to regulate risks inherent in thought and expression come directly from 1984.

When I say a review, I am referring to the censorship system. In the United States there is a corporatist regime, there is no meaningful separation between government power and corporate power, so corporate media is government media, corporate censorship is government censorship. Legal sponsored senator to meet with wealthy social media stakeholders to discuss how to use Internet censorship to "prevent the discomfort of the US" at your Senate Judiciary Committee meeting When you are sponsored by, you gain government censorship

In the corporateist government system, there is no meaningful separation between corporate power and government power, and corporate censorship is government censorship. The new empire refuses the camera time for corporate media owned by wealthy people and silences others through a social media company without merely suppressing opposition through government censorship. As WikiLeaks editor Julian Assange pointed out recently, Medium's CEO is co-founder of Twitter. As long as you count as a host that asked you to stop cursing those who condemn me as Kremlin's agent, the media has been good to me so far, I did not consider any problems there . In such cases, you will pay more attention to your work than ever using the Streisand effect.

In the United States, excuses of censorship are usually expressed in the following format - "The first amendment only protects the speech from the US federal government." If this ruling later did not violate the first amendment, review It will not be. In other words, review was done by organizations other than the US government, so it was not actually reviewed. Of course, this is wrong. Because it is based on the cyclic definition of censorship, the above excuses are incorrect. What is needed is a useful definition of censorship. Fortunately, once you understand that this is a concept preceding the US Constitution, reviewing the definition is easy. In the simplest terms, censorship is suppression of information and ideas. Most private amateurs can tell you because our private life is being increasingly influenced by censorship of social media