The Risks from Nuclear Power Outweighs the Gains

In today's technology era, people's electricity demand is very high. For that reason, there are various types of power plants around the world, including fossil fuel power plants, photovoltaic power plants, and wind power plants. However, due to the potentially devastating global warming effects of fossil fuels, expensive solar power generation, and unstable wind power generation, people are pursuing low-cost but carbon-free power generation. Early in the 20th century, scientists discovered nuclear power.

In 1986, the massive disaster in Chernobyl in Ukraine and in Japan in Fukushima in Japan raised public awareness of the dangers of nuclear power generation. Therefore, enthusiasm for nuclear power has waned. The devastating risk of nuclear energy, such as the collapse of nuclear reactors in Japan and Ukraine, far exceeds the potential benefits. Disasters such as Fukushima and Chernobyl released large amounts of radiation to neighboring communities and evacuated thousands of people. Many of them may never come back. If any signs are seen in the current performance of the industry, there is a possibility that a major disaster may occur every ten years.

Nuclear weapons can safeguard the world, nuclear energy is often said to be an inexpensive and environmentally friendly source of electricity. In this article, it is quite the opposite of these advantages over disadvantages. The disadvantage is the elimination of human beings and the destruction of the earth. It is foolish to guarantee that superpowers do not participate in war, so it is good to believe that the major powers with nuclear warheads point to each other. This is because only one mistake or unauthorized commander is necessary to cause a nuclear dispute. For example, during the Cuba missile crisis, the US and the Soviet Union were very close to launching missiles. And it shows that they were not actually the ultimate deterrent, but nuclear war was possible.

There are many reasons why nuclear weapons have never been used. Attacking other units with nuclear weapons can damage themselves, and because there is the possibility that there may be no political interests to sacrifice even a few nuclear bombs, obviously absolutely ruthless is. As Egypt and Syria did in the Yom Kippur War of 1973 it is possible to use the conventional power to attack the country with nuclear weapons, but if you do, your goal is the most limited It is. Or it is independent. Let's say you were attacked. The use of nuclear weapons to attack non-nuclear weapon states is also very expensive for the reputation of the country that is attacking. The good news is that people do not need to think these things very wisely or perfectly rationally.