The Rise and Fall of Marc Antony

There are many places to mention in classical Rome, such as ancient city states such as Julius Caesar, Pompeii, Augustus and famous historical figures. The Roman Empire, once known as the Roman Republic, supported the aristocracy, advised on policy, and maintained the aristocratic government who elected a regional judge, the center of Roman political life. In Rome there are also a number of military commanders to help expand the territory and wealth of Rome by conquering the land, enslaving the prisoners and establishing trade;

Mark · Anthony, Brutus, Cassius are important players of William · Shakespeare's famous drama "Julius · Caesar's tragedy". Due to their unique personality and values, all of these characters do not have any common features, even though they share some features with each other. First of all, Marc Antony and Cassius are inherently operational, but Brutus does not. Secondly, the root cause of Brutus and Cassius's failure is in their personality flaws, and Mark Anthony prove his strength with their proof of their weakness.

In Julius Caesar at William Shakespeare, Mark Anthony was allowed to speak at Caesar's funeral, but he should not talk to accomplices and Caesar. Anthony was angry with Caesar's assassination and hoped to revenge his own killer and gain power in the Roman government. He must convince the gathered crowd, Caesar's murder is unfair, and they oppose Brutus and Cassius. He aroused the anger of his audience and tried to motivate them to act, and I could not say anything bad about his enemies. Mark Anthony used several compelling devices at his speech, it made it possible to persuade him to turn the Romans successfully ... See more

Mark Anthony was allowed to speak at Caesar's funeral on condition that he will not destroy accomplices. Therefore, Mark Anthony has never directly told that Brutus and other conspiracy lie to their motives for murder. Mark Anthony was limited by not being able to publicly show his contempt for terrible murder, so he took a more subtle approach and gradually faced the crowd against the murderer. Members of the audience may have one of three attitudes towards the question or rhetoric spirit: they may be hostile, indifferent or acceptable. Communication researchers discovered that moving people who care about problems is easier than moving those who do not mind. In other words, people who accept or hostile are more likely to change their minds than indifferent people. (212)