The Rights of One Man Are Not the Right of Another

The right of one person is not the rights of others In the late 17th century, the population of France was on the verge of revolution. Under the rule of Louis XVI, the French suffered increasingly frustration due to the seven year war and the economic crisis after the American Revolutionary War. In the meantime, the French wanted not only rich people, but all were equal.

Toma Spain wrote as follows: "Rights are neither a gift from one person to another nor a gift from one type of person to another ... the origin of rights, hence the right is It belongs to the right of human rights and its existence must equal everyone. "The origin of human rights is given by God or given by the government. If you stand on the side of defending the human rights of the government, you may accept that these rights are denied.

If someone has the right to work for others, it means that others are deprived of their rights and deprived of the right to enslave labor. The so-called "rights" of those who are suspected of infringing the rights of others are not rights, they can not be so. Nobody has the right to charge unselected obligations, unfounded obligations, or unwilling slavery to others. There is no such thing as "the right of slavery". Rand clearly pointed out that this principle is the root cause of correctness. Everyone's life legally belongs to him because everyone's moral belongs to him. Everyone is morally my own goal - not a means to achieve the purpose of others

Another advantage of robbing your own rights is to grant rights to everyone's rights. People who abandon or abandon their rights do not grant rights to others, and not everyone has natural rights. Obstacles, not obstacles without other things. Therefore, the impact of that person's reappearance due to the correct defect of others greatly reduces the barriers to using the principle of his own rights.