Right of political prisoners and rights of terrorists In this article we discuss why political prisoners have been classified as terrorists since September 11, 2001 and consider the rights of political prisoners to terrorists. In this article, I first understand why political prisoners are classified as terrorists. Secondly, I oppose these rights. In any case, I think that all forms of political prisoners want to take any form of action in order to infringe on the rights of my life and to enjoy the rights of life.
International terrorists should be treated fairly. They should not be regarded as legitimate combatants but they have all the rights they have for the glorious prisoners they have, along with the rights of all legitimate processes they have ing. They are not ordinary criminals, but instead are part of the world politics - religion - the ideal rebellion that uses terrorism as a means of clarifying political objectives. However, the exact difference in illegal combatants owed in the process of legitimate treatment or capture may differ from the legitimate combatants owed after capture. Handle them accurately as illegal enemy combatants
Guerrillas can fight a small number of weapons and usually inappropriate weapons, but you can accept and exchange prisoners according to the custom of war and fight while respecting the rights of noncombatants. Terrorists have no restrictions on the means used, and they often take a mass assassination to cause "general fear" to civilians. As mentioned above, the proposed definition distinguishes terrorism and guerrilla activities based on predetermined goals. In this definition, if an attack is deliberately directed to civilians, that attack is considered a terrorist attack and is considered a guerrilla attack if it is targeted to an army or security personnel. It depends on who the target victim is. First of all, this definition is designed to answer the need to analyze specific events and classify them as terrorism or guerilla activities.