The Right To Die

The right to death Modern medical technology makes it possible to extend the lives of many people far beyond the age of death of the past. In modern times, death usually ensures long-lasting painful degeneration. In that case, people lose control both physically and mentally. Some people accept the time when modern technology buys them, others feel that overwhelming dominance is overwhelming and awful. Because they are not like this, they want their loved ones to remember them. Some even choose to die in order to avoid the burden of tracing.

We have no right to death. Rights are moral claims. We have no requirement for death; on the contrary, we need us to die! Some people think that "the right to die" is in parallel with "the right to life". In fact, they are the opposite. "Right to life" is based on the fact that life is a property we do not own (we can freely buy, sell or transfer or destroy it) is an unavoidable right . It can not be robbed by others or yourself. Instead, "right to die" is based on what we consider life to be "what we have", and when it no longer meets our satisfaction we may throw it away. The idea of ​​"the right of death" is that there is a "life without value in life". But for Christians life itself is worth it. It is not because it meets certain criteria established by us and others.

The moral problem is whether the right of death can coexist with the right of life. Some people think that the right of life is impossible to transfer, they can not give up and therefore may not be compatible with the right to die. In bioethics, there is discussion as to whether the right of death is universal and applies only to certain situations (such as end stage illness) or existence. It is also pointed out that "life right" is not synonymous with "life obligation". From this point of view, the right of life can coexist with the right to die.

There is no "right to death", if it passes, it means "the right to obtain life on demand". But there is a true right to death and the dying people have the right to expect to have all their comfort in their death. VE sometimes seems to be an expression of privacy statements as if it were an important issue between patients and physicians. If a doctor agrees with euthanasia it may simply be the reason that he / she has concluded that life has lost sufficient value - nobody will destroy the life they evaluate. However, if you are satisfied with the idea that a doctor can assign low values ​​to some patients living with the support of the law, they may be fatal to others in a similar situation But it is not. Request to die