The Right To Die

Death and death are not terminally ill. The problem is the way to die. Suicide behavior is uncomfortable, people do not like to discuss this topic, but suicide has happened. Some people, especially those suffering from painful intractable diseases, hope to end their suffering. People with terminal disease and those with debilitating disease should choose to die for help from a doctor. However, only three countries are currently permitting physicians to assist suicide patients, many of which do not have the painless method of prompting the support and suicide they need.

The moral problem is whether the right of death can coexist with the right of life. Some people think that the right of life is impossible to transfer, they can not give up and therefore may not be compatible with the right to die. In bioethics, there is discussion as to whether the right of death is universal and applies only to certain situations (such as end stage illness) or existence. It is also pointed out that "life right" is not synonymous with "life obligation". From this point of view, the right of life can coexist with the right to die.

We have no right to death. Rights are moral claims. We have no requirement for death; on the contrary, we need us to die! Some people think that "the right to die" is in parallel with "the right to life". In fact, they are the opposite. "Right to life" is based on the fact that life is a property we do not own (we can freely buy, sell or transfer or destroy it) is an unavoidable right . It can not be robbed by others or yourself. Instead, "right to die" is based on what we consider life to be "what we have", and when it no longer meets our satisfaction we may throw it away. The idea of ​​"the right of death" is that there is a "life without value in life". But for Christians life itself is worth it. It is not because it meets certain criteria established by us and others.

There is no "right to death", if it passes, it means "the right to obtain life on demand". But there is a true right to death and the dying people have the right to expect to have all their comfort in their death. VE sometimes seems to be an expression of privacy statements as if it were an important issue between patients and physicians. If a doctor agrees with euthanasia it may simply be the reason that he / she has concluded that life has lost sufficient value - nobody will destroy the life they evaluate. However, if you are satisfied with the idea that a doctor can assign low values ​​to some patients living with the support of the law, they may be fatal to others in a similar situation But it is not. Request to die