According to Philipus Auredous Paracelsus, "Medical is not mere science but art, the doctor's character may be more powerful than the medicine used." Medicine is an exceptional research area, you meet people of all walks of life and encounter various situations every day. More importantly, when entering medical school, graduating, even after graduation, one of the most important things in your mind is prescription, prescription and prescription.
Patients have certain rights, including the right to receive treatment in emergencies, but they also have the right to refuse treatment. From a moral point of view, doctors and other health professionals are responsible or obliged to protect their lives and health. But after all, even if it chooses to opt for them to refuse treatment, the patient will make a final decision on the treatment they will receive. Every patient has the right to choose healthcare providers offering medical services. It usually comes from a doctor or a patient at a hospital. Doctors and hospitals can introduce patients to experts, family health management, long-term facilities, or other health care professionals for further care beyond the ability to provide expert knowledge and ongoing care It is common.
Discussion In this article we will explore the arguments for and against the recognition of this right. We believe that refusing treatment is not just the right to agree on treatment. Refusal requires higher maturity, especially long-term influence by refusing treatment decisions.
Refusal of care: The law fully recognizes the right to refuse treatment, including maintaining life or extending life. For example, a patient with blood cancer can refuse treatment or refuse nutrition through the nasogastric tube. The right to refuse treatment is the way to passive euthanasia. Many people believe that acknowledging the medical termination of pregnancy 16 weeks ago is also an active involuntary euthanasia. The Netherlands is already discussing the problem of sympathy and deformed baby's murder.