The jury has exercised legal jurisdiction over 600 years ago - that is, since Magna Carta in 1215 - there is no clearer British or American constitutional principle. In fact, what is the law and the moral intent of the defendant; however, they say that the fairness of the law, and in their view, all laws that are considered inequitable or repressive are invalid and they The main responsibility of it is also their primary and most important responsibility and everyone is not guilty and can neither resist nor resist the enforcement of such laws.
The jury's right to be tried in a criminal case is guaranteed by the sixth amendment of the US Constitution and the laws of each state. Lawyers and judges choose juries through a program called "voir dire" in the Latin "to tell the truth". In the "case" case, both the judge and the lawyer asked the potential jury to decide whether they are eligible and appropriate for the service of the affair. The jury's in-choice mistake is a common reason for criminal prosecution
The court is a court, the legal liability of the person suspected of violating the criminal code is determined by the jury or the judge. The purpose of the court is to discover the truth seeking justice. The main participants of the court are prosecutors, counsel, judges. Federal and state judicial systems carry out the same functions (enforcement of laws, proceedings of litigation, and punishment of offenders), but the laws and institutions of the two systems are different. The Legislature has enacted most criminal laws. And it is forced by state and local police. Municipal and county public prosecutors have tried judges in the state court for suspicion of state law violation. Criminals were convicted of a crime against state law to prison sentences in prisons regulated by the provinces or state-managed correctional establishments. At the federal level, Congress enforces the Penal Code and Federal law enforcement agencies such as the Federal Bureau of Investigation will enforce these laws.
"The guarantee of federal courts and state courts' jury trial reflects a deep judgment on how laws are enforced and the enforcement of justice.The criminal defendant is entitled to a jury trial to prevent government repression.The judge It is known that it is necessary to protect people from unfound criminal lawsuits that can eliminate enemies while they are overreacting to the boss's voice.The effect of arbitrary behavior The accused Is entitled to be heard by a companion jury, which makes him an immense safety device that can not prevent overly enthusiastic prosecutors and judges of offense, prejudice or eccentric corruption Terminology .. fear of unlimited power .... 48