The Resurrection of Christ

Resurrection of Christ is one of the most suspicious studies of scientists. Theologians also insist on this topic. Without resurrection Christian faith will be in vain and Christians will not be a Christian. Indeed, there are several theories trying to prove that resurrection is wrong. Since Christ was raised from the death, the theories of sue, theft, the wrong grave, and hallucination are all incorrect. According to the theory of Sune, Christ did not die, just fainted, and still alive. Then, after being crucified and buried, Jesus took away the big stone, appeared to the people, and kept living on the earth.

More shocking is the fact that the life, death and resurrection of Christ have historical evidence rather than evolution. To be honest, the historical rejection for the resurrection of Christ is like a doubt that the United States declared freedom in 1776, or that Columbus landed in North America in 1492. In his book "The History of the Resurrection of Jesus", Michael Linona casts doubts. A wide list of scholars, such as Brodeur, Collins, Conzelman, Fee, Gundry, Harris, Hayes, Hèring, Hurtado, Johnson, Kistemaker, Lockwood, Martin, Segal, Snyder, Thiselton, Witherington etc. have confirmed the history of Christ's death and resurrection I will. And light

Abdul Bach teaches that the resurrection of Christ is a spiritual resurrection and the story of the Gospel is a metaphor. Abdulbar writes like this. "Therefore, we explain the meaning of the resurrection of Christ as follows: After the martyrdom of Christ, the apostles became confused and depressed, and his spiritual power was in his martyrdom It was hidden hidden for a few days after, and it seemed to be completely lost - in fact it seemed to be completely lost. After three days the apostles firmly I decided to resolve, to help the words of the holy Christ, to promote the teaching of God, to practice the advice of their Lord, and to serve him.