The Reluctant Scientist

As a passive scientist, I need to ask myself a woman who is not interested in science (in fact, never dissected like a high school frog). Students, and most importantly, I hate them. In other words, in a science class full of students in elementary school fourth grade, mouse bones are made from the pill of graduate students. Well, this is not easy, let me tell you. About two years ago, when my ten year old little girl came home she was passionate about the latest science project in her class.

Most scientists do not want to admit that the answer to the question of science persistence is obvious. They are more than they are willing to do. The primary reason is that the answer to the stubborn problem is that people do not want to hear and bad news can lead them to kill messenger science. People are paying for science by supporting the National Institutes of Health, the National Science Foundation, and most of the universities studying. Therefore, scientists have incentives to conceal them. Science is wrong, scientists are taught that it will never be revealed even in their own conclusions; since the persistent problem is so extensive that scientists' research plans are based on these Do not solve the problem directly. Few people are ready to stretch their heads from their profession when they do not need it. For scientists who are silent about science, the real answer to the problem of persistence is not definitive.

I saw a future that scientists have a mission to make their interests and the world a better place. Scientists pay attention to environmental, medical, social problems in society. Scientists are reluctant to negotiate with the public and negative. Scientists represent their community and their communities represent science. I can see the future where scientists cross over the border. Scientists of all gender and color, cultural and social background. Science does not care about school district lines, neighbors, border walls, visas, or citizenship documents. Science is focusing on evidence. Evidence is higher and stronger than any boundary. There is no passport in the evidence

The career of scientists is closely related to the number of publications of magazines. These same journals may be reluctant to announce negative findings. Researchers are also fighting for limited grants and positions that are almost always wanted. As a result, researchers face the situation of "publication or demise" that gives priority to the reliability of publications. They fail to experiment, that they can not record data, overlook the details of key protocols, use statistical data improperly, and publish so that they can not handle bureaucrats in the laboratory focusing. In many cases, there are differences in reagents, it is difficult to reproduce expertise. Researchers use data and results consistent with experimental goals and ideas. This saves time and money and keeps them steady for regular releases