The Relationship Between the Transactional Model, and the General Adaptation Syndrome

The term "stress" is widely believed to be the concept invented by Robert Hooke in the 17th century. He is devoted to the design of a physical structure like a bridge; his concept of stress comes from how much pressure the structure can withstand. However, Lazarus (1993) pointed out that the term "stress" was used early in the 14th century. At the time, it was referring to external stress factors such as death of the spouse and economic concerns; in the 20th century, there were schools of various ways of thinking in this area.

This paper aims to compare and contrast two of the four stress models, Hans Selye (1907-1982) general adaptation syndrome (GAS) and Mowrer (1939) avoidance model. First, the author gives the definition of the published stress, then the author briefly discusses the term stress. This paper studies Selye (1956) general adaptation syndrome and Mowrer (1939) avoidance stress model, then compares and compares each period of the two models. But even though the age of writing is different, the two stories may show similarity, even with the most obvious differences. In other words, these two articles are separated for decades, and the opposite theme seems to have little in common, but the backbone of each story contains another inclusion aspect. Comparison and contrast with Lewis Carroll's Alice adventure

Selye (1977) developed a "general adaptation syndrome" model. A general adaptive syndrome can be defined as the sum of the general expansion of the body and the systemic response due to sustained and prolonged stress exposure. When a person shows unhealthy symptoms it may be due to his pressure being under pressure. He discovered that stress is likely to accumulate in the body, if the relevant stress factors are not eliminated, the human body will experience a predictable phase.

This model is different from the previous model. It is a transaction and multidimensional model that emphasizes interpersonal relationships and interactions. It emphasizes that communication between people is a two-part process where two people interact and affect each other. In this model, action plays an important role. People adjust their roles based on how they want others to be recognized. From the model of Leary, it can be thought that all communication is in line with two things: domination and hatred. Both of these dimensions can occur during a dialog. When an individual talks, each message has superior compliance quality and unpleasant love quality. Respond to messages based on perceptual messages from individuals