The Relational Properties Approach to a Theory of Interpretation

Interpretation of the outline of methodology of relation theory: In this article we will review the central point of Gadamer's interpretation theory. In short, objectivity is not ideal for understanding texts, historical events, cultural phenomena. Since Gadamer does not clarify the reason for this claim, I think there are three possible arguments. The first thing dominant in the second literature is based on the premise that we can not go beyond our history with bias.

Two general ways of defining "physicalism" are based on theory and object-based methods. The concept of physics based on theory states that "when an attribute is a property that the physical theory tells us, or when it is a metaphysical (or logical) property that transcends physical properties, its nature is physically Similarly, the object-based concept states that the attribute is physical only if: it is an attribute that fully describes the paradigm physical object and the essence of its component, or metaphysical To oversee the properties required to fully describe the physical object of the attribute (or logical) paradigm and the essence of that component

Bilateral theory has at least two major versions. According to this theory, the object has attributes of two aspects. That is, they have two sets of attributes. Built-in properties. In our opinion it is neither spatial nor temporal (Langton 1998). This attribute - dualism interpretation faces the same epistemology as interpretation of two objects. Because we do not have a better position to get knowledge about attributes that we do not belong to. Knowledge We furthermore, this interpretation seems to suggest that the object itself is space and time because the appearance itself has spatial and temporal characteristics.

What does the word "attribute" mean when describing objects that change properties over time? In relation theory, the term "property" is intended to exclude the so-called similar property of Nielsen Goodman. Let's define the object as grue. Only if it exists, the object turns green before 1888 and then becomes blue. According to this definition we can conclude that the world's chlorophyll experienced a change from glow to nonanglaw in 1888. We naturally lead to this conclusion saying that this change in chlorophyll is neither "real change" nor "normal change". "With chlorophyll, grue is not a normal property