The Reconstruction of Humanism

The JSTOR site is scheduled to be maintained between 10 AM on Wednesday, October 17, 2018 (6 AM EST) and 11 AM (7 AM EST). During this time, the user can not log in to the organization or personal account to purchase or perform administrative operations. Thank you for your patience and understanding. If you have any questions or problems, please contact JSTOR support.

The paradigm is not strange, it was always a fixed, immovable one. The paradigm is a social structure created by people. In our history, they have been able to be changed and rebuilt by humans, and it has become so (Capra 1983: 30). For example, Kuhn (1970: 92) discusses the scientific and political revolution that brought about paradigm shift and change. Kuhn suggests that these changes will occur when part of the community (usually a small part) becomes increasingly aware that existing organizations can not properly solve or solve problems within the environment. . Actions taken by parts of dissatisfied communities may lead to replacing all or part of the old paradigm with an updated paradigm

From the beginning, reconstruction of paleontology was a very general aspect of human origin research. In the past 50 years, the perception of what the earliest ancestors have eaten has changed significantly, and the ancient anthropologists have not yet reached consensus. Early ancient anthropological discourse focused on meat consumption in early human catering (1968, Krantz, 1968, Lee and DeVore, 1957, Washburn). A particularly intense image was made for the southern ape. And, usually fierce confrontation (Keyes Roper, 1969), cannibalism (eg Emiliani, 1968), and game hunting (eg Brown and Lahren, 1973; Isaac, 1983; Krantz), 1968). Interestingly, these assumptions are largely based on evidence and are finally abandoned. One of the main effects of eating meat is an increase in cranial skill (Aiello and Wheeler, 1995), but this trend was not observed until the appearance of humans.