The Real Crux of Sino-Tibetan Relations

The true core of the relationship between China and Tibet is that the Tibetan leaders who exiled in the neighboring India after Tibet formally forcibly consolidated the People's Republic of China for more than fifty years agreed that Tibetan human rights It struggled to resist any Tibetan supporters in the fight. Stimulation and pressure; but after a long stall, the change seems imminent and the final solution does not look so far.

Chinese belongs to the middle Tibetan group. Medium Tibetan is a combination of the main language genes of the Indo-European language (German, French, Hindi etc.) to which English belongs. The Middle East - Tibetan community spread from northeast India to northeast China, and billions of people live in Southeast Asia, South Asia, East Asia. Chinese itself is not a language, it is a family of languages ​​like French, Spanish, Italian, Romanian, and Swiss romance. Like romance, Chinese languages ​​can not understand each other (this is why they are made into different languages). However, since they have a lot of common history and commonly used vocabulary and grammar, it is easier for people who speak Chinese to learn other Chinese than a complete foreign language. Likewise, the same is true for romantic languages.

Most linguists classify all Chinese as part of medium Tibetan language with Burmese, Tibetan, and Himalayas and many other languages ​​in Southeast Asia. This relationship was first proposed at the beginning of the 19th century and is now widely accepted, but the reconstruction of Han and Tibet is much less reconstructed than the department that speaks Indian European and European. Difficulties include language diversity, the lack of distortion in many languages, and the impact of language contact. In addition, many small languages ​​are used in mountains where hands are hard to reach, and in many cases it is a region sensitive to the border. Without secure reconstruction of the original Sino-Tibetan people, the high-rise structure of the family remains unknown. It is usually assumed to be at the top of the Chinese and Tibetan-Burmese languages, but it has not been proved to be convincing yet.