The Real Count Dracula

The true Count Dracula begins with Earl Dracula, an immortal immortal monster. Dracula can become a bat at night and when he touches the smallest light during the day he will burn to the mountain of ashes. Dracula often has a fang that breaks the skin around the neck of a bloody man. Dracula can live to the time he wishes if he can survive so long. Dracula lives in Transylvania. A lot of people have heard the different stories of Earl Dracula, but not all the stories are the same.

Bram Stoker's Dracula Book is Jonathan Harker, an assistant real estate agent that moves to Carpathian Mountains in Transylvania and counts real estate in Count Dracula. Trading, he lives in an old medieval castle. When the count saw Harker 's fiancé, Mina' s picture, he told Jonathan Harker to write to her, he said he would stay in the next few weeks. When Jonathan was trapped in the castle, the number went to London to meet Mina He thought Mina was the reincarnation of his wife and suicide princess. Then he imprisoned Jonathan in his castle.

Count Dracula is a human beast, an explanation of Dracula of a mysterious and horrible novel "Dracula". The Dracula Earl's Transylvania concept is described as the king of darkness, unpredictable savage man, and the human ruler who reconstructs his existence throughout mankind. Earl Dracula is always seen as an anti-hero in a barbarian era. As Dracula uses the blood of citizens, his own existence can be expanded to all of Europe and the country. "Under the moonlight opposite me, three young ladies wearing their clothes and manners, although the moonlight was behind them, they were not there because they were not there because they were not there If there is a shadow on it, this is deliberately sexy, sometimes annoyed or disliked.

When I first saw Brac Stoker's Dracula (hereinafter called Dracula), I was a teenage boy who saw a lot of vampire movies in his 80s, but these movies were far from Bela Lugosi and Universal . Alternatively, the prototype of Count Dracula related to Christopher Lee and Hammer. This version of 1992 is more epoch-making than my older audience for my generation, as long as I have never read Stoke's original novel unless you count the light version for children. The only convincing Dracula's adaptation is the 1979 edition of John Buddam led by Frank Langela and, oddly enough, Hollywood has been 25 years since Coppola's movie. Adaptation did not show up. The latest update like Dracula 2000 (2000) and re-imagining like Dracula Untold (2014)