THE RADICALIZATION PROCESS

The radicalization process leading to violence follows a nonlinear unscheduled path formed by several factors, namely personal and collective, social and psychological factors. A single element alone is not enough to explain the radicalization of individual or individual groups. This process is the result of a combination of belief schemes that use specific individual journeys and violence. It is considered a moral hazard or personal identity and can be exacerbated by threats promoted by physical and virtual social networks.

As shown in the following figure, it is unlikely that radicalization leading to violence takes the form of a sudden or sudden change, but complex social changes occur at various levels.

At the social level, the process of radicalization may directly, or indirectly influence, influence or be cultivated in an individual's socio-political or social emotional environment. In the face of political, social or economic discomfort, individuals may question the promise of unity (mediocre life) and the sense of belonging to the community, regardless of whether it is genuine or perceived Hmm.

Those who experience discomfort, are considered unfair or marginalized can ask for answers and relief for circumstances that feel unfairness or need relief. The degree of protective or fragile elements present in the personal living environment may help to influence their view of the world and to adopt a specific extreme view to justify violence not.

For those who are edified, all interpretations of the world must ideologically be seen in groups of "good" and "bad", "we" and "them", and "pure" and "impurities" not. Because of the progressive dichotomy of this world, these individuals systematically reject any interpretation or alternate views of society. In the process of teaching, ideology provides reasons and explanations to encourage believers to participate in more extreme actions, including active support and involvement in violence.

The following video presents a summary that will help you understand the dynamics involved in radicalization leading to violence and how they relate.

In this article I will not elaborate on the process of actual radicalization and participation in the terrorist group or the specific circumstances causing the radicalization process. The exact steps in the process and their order are definitely meaningful, but they are beyond the scope of this article. The focus here is only to promote this process. Similarly, surveys of interventions to prevent or reduce radicalization are beyond the scope of this article. The title of this paper may be "a promoter of extreme terrorism".

Explain how Kim and Taylor explain the radicalization process to achieve research goals and why their research is focusing on the "native" jihadist radicalization. King and Taylor explain the radicalization process as a process that requires more than just understanding. That's why King and Taylor understand all of the five radical models at the same time and understand the cause of the radicalization process. By comparing the methods, King and Taylor were able to notice the similarities and differences between these methods. The radical focus of this research is "local jihadist" as radical radical ideologies created by terrorist organizations like Al Qaeda are currently threatening the West (King and Taylor, 2011).

Radicalization is the process by which individuals (or groups) take extremeistic views, especially socio-political or religious perspectives. But being "extremists" is not the same as becoming a terrorist. Not everyone who has an extreme view or extremist viewpoint decides not to participate in violence. For example, the 1995 Oklahoma City bombardment was made by two white former US military partners who had views of extreme right wing and extreme anti-Federal patriot movements. According to the New York Times news survey in the United States recently since September 11, 2001 "white superiorists, anti-government fanatics and other non Muslim extremists are almost two of extreme Muslims The probability is double. "