The United States has privileges compared with most countries in the world. Americans have the right to freedom not available in other countries, such as freedom of speech, freedom of speech, religious beliefs, voluntary gatherings, free pleas and the right to own weapons. All Americans have the right to undertake basic education regardless of race, sex or income; all Americans are able to obtain at least a high school diploma. This is wonderful, but the quality of education of people receiving in the United States is not fully aware of its possibilities.
The quality of education is important to the people of the United States. Although it seems obvious that there may not be a clearer answer to this problem. Traditional classroom education that the country has been doing for centuries has been threatened by the acquisition of electronic. Rather than making the classroom advance more technologically, we will replace them at home's online course instead. Unfortunately, many students do not need this kind of education, they do it for pure convenience.
Education is one of the few professions defined in this mediocrity certificate. Ironically, first of all, this is the most obvious for those who manage education. The United States demands high quality education and high quality legislation, but where is the quality of a person you have not learned so far? Her educational value is small, some of which comes from her strong insults on Charter School. You have heard discussions about vouchers and school choices. Some charter schools are backed by quality. Other people are not. Originally, they were developed as a magnetic school in the neighborhood with a lower school public school. Here, they temporarily solved faculty placement and insufficient fund classroom problems. But even if it is a voucher, the entire system based on them has never gone too far. Because it basically ignores the concept of free public education in the United States.
Why is it so difficult to provide intermediate education in the United States? A large-scale survey on expenditure of public schools in the United States found that schools in wealthy areas spend more on teachers' salaries. As a result poor areas can not attract teachers of the same quality. "Low-income students need additional support and resources to succeed, but policies assigning teachers and allocating resources in too many places will cause problems over the long term rather than problem solving," "Said former education minister Arne Duncan. According to economist Eduard Porter, "income inequality is expanding ... leading to isolation of residents. By linking wealthy school districts and the poor, public education for wealthy Americans who can opt out We will reduce our support. "