Purpose of the Restoration Judiciary Approach Introduction High crime rates indicate that the judicial system has not been successful in identifying criminal acts. An alternative to imprisonment called restorative justice has existed for centuries, but recently it was introduced to the Canadian justice system. The practice of restorative justice has proven to be extremely successful for adults and young people in minor crimes that connect criminals, victims, and communities.
Recently, the school began pursuing restorative justice. This is also known as a restorative practice. It is seen as an alternative to the typical punishment / stoppage method used in history, and it is known that punishment for color students is excessively punished. Today, I will examine what recovery practices are and how they are looking at school. Shane Safir, Jen Adkins, Timothy Hilton, Crystal T. Laura, Mark Katz commented on this topic. In my BAM, I can hear a ten-minute conversation with Shane, Jen, Timothy. Radio programs You can also find lists and links to previous shows here.
Recovery justice is another way to punish students, aiming to balance the process of being too tolerant and overly punitive. The purpose of restorative justice is not to punish them, but to find a solution in cooperation with students (victims and defendants). Restoration Justice aims to solve problems, implement fair punishment, and promote understanding and coordination of student behavior. In school, restorative justice seems like a collaborative discussion than the traditional punishment we know. The actual restoration judgment includes all related parties to discuss related events. Victims have the opportunity to share their feelings with the accused. Because the main purpose is to recover rather than punishment, repair actions must provide equal time for each party.