The Publicity of Thought and Language

I am trying to clarify the way people publish languages ​​and ideas. For each of these papers, I distinguish between the four formats that can build them and the two methods to build them. One is to think from language propaganda and the other is to advertise language to advertisement of ideas. Without the argument that linguistic and thinking is dependent on each other I will show that these strategies are impossible. Even if we accept this argument, the second strategy is more difficult than the first one It brings about.

There are two ideologies in this discussion. Languageism insists that there is no word, has no idea, denies understanding of all forms of thought without words. On the other hand, "ideology" theory thinks that the official language is not important for private thought. The primary purpose of the language is to convey ideas from one idea to another. Entering other person's linguistic information from your own mind leads people to accept new ideas that will greatly influence knowledge, reasoning and follow-up behavior in his world. Language does not create or distort a conceptual life. The idea is the first, language is the expression. There are some restrictions between languages, and humans can not express everything they desire.

The ongoing debate in the field of linguistics is whether language is controlled by thought or language. Edward Sapir and Benjamin Wolfe propose the hypothesis that the mother tongue of people dominates their ideas and if they are not expressed in their mother tongue they will not understand that concept. The situation of Hopi is used to support this theory. Unlike western languages, Sapir-Wolf believes that the Hopi tribe does not have the concept of time and therefore can not understand the concept of time. Similar incidents such as Inuit events have been proposed, they are recorded as many words of different snow, and because we can not describe different types of snow, we understand physically can not. It will be explained to us and named. Do you think with words? Can you understand the concept that there is no name?