The Psychoanalysis of 1984

In 1984 George Orwell psychoanalyzes social structure in 1984 based on Freud's mind map and identity, struggle between ego and super ego. Thoughts of people living in this society are trained to think in some way. Freud's psychoanalysis theory can be applied to Orwell in 1984. Using Freud's psychoanalytic approach, Winston Smith in 1984 was drawn as a person who violated the thought of the parties. From the viewpoint of Freud, Winston's role represents the idea that identity is the driving force, and that self and supernatural have poor opinion of the party.

1984 Analysis Based Mental Adolf Grubbum Publishing, author Freud's aim is to create science, but because all the data collected point out that it is contaminating analyst patients, psychoanalysis controversy The social response to the response caused the transfer. Psychoanalysis community to address sentence Grünbaum, pointing out that the purpose of the survey is comprehensive explanation and interpretation advertisement, psychoanalysis can not be understood understanding as a scientific investigation method. Therefore, it must be regarded as part of the interpretive study method

In 1984 George Orwell psychoanalyzes social structure in 1984 based on Freud's mind map and identity, struggle between ego and super ego. Thoughts of people living in this society are trained to think in some way. Freud's psychoanalysis theory can be applied to Orwell in 1984. Using Freud's psychoanalytic approach, Winston Smith in 1984 was drawn as a person who violated the thought of the parties. From the viewpoint of Freud, Winston's role represents the idea that identity is the driving force, and that self and supernatural have poor opinion of the party.

Grünbaum caused at least three important reactions. "Psychological analysis of hypotheses and evidence" (1984) - - To respond to his attacks Analyst Marshall Edelson (Marshall Edelson) was a professor of psychiatry at Yale University and especially wrote a complete book. Recently, two philosophers David Sachs and Frank Cioffi announced a shorter but still sharp criticism of Grünbaum's analysis. Sachs is the advocate of analysis, and Cioffi is a faithful opponent, but it is clear that they agreed to place Grünbaum error