The Problematic Hunt for a Gay Gene

Genetic research involving many people is looking for "gay gene". The discovery of this gene began in the 1990s and there still remains the question of whether this gene exists and whether it really affects sexual orientation. Several studies to study sexual orientation through behavioral genetics and molecular genetics have been completed. However, most of these studies have not been reproduced, and they are causing ethical problems. Simon LeVay, a neuroscientist who studies brain function and sexual orientation (Wikipedia contributor, 2014) has published an article in 1991 entitled "Difference in Hypothalamus Structure Between Heterosexuality and Gay Men". Biological reasoning

We have not found a research that certain "gay genes" certainly make someone gay. However, some genes may make homosexuality more likely. For example, in the study of 2014 Journal of Psychomedicine, one gene on the X chromosome (one of the sex chromosomes) is called Xq 28 and the gene on chromosome 8 seems to be more common among homosexuals . This study of more than 400 homosexual brothers follows the genetics of Dean Hamer's 1993 report, which suggests the existence of a "homosexual gene". Other studies have found that homosexuality tends to run at home. Two identical twins, they are likely to share all genes, they are homosexuals, and the twins of two brothers have only half of the genes, they are all homosexuals. These studies also show that genes seem to have a major impact on the sexual orientation of the same twins of men and women.

In general population, the possibility of being homosexual is less than 5%. And unless you have gays twins, the opportunity here is much higher. If you are a brother sharing half of the genes, you have 25% chance of becoming gay. If all genes share the same thing, you have 50% chance of becoming gay. This indicates that there must be some genetic factors in our sexual behavior. But it can not be totally attributed to genes. Several other factors must work

Well ... as people are born with black eyes, they are born as homosexuals. The interesting thing is that science tells us that there are no homosexual genes here. .... But no gay genes, it tells us that the whole discussion itself is invalid. I do not think Kevin misunderstands me. I think that it is unreasonable to apply his argument directly by quoting quotes from the Bible rather than understanding the overall information of the Bible. But anyway, today's politics, especially in such multicultural countries, religion must not involve politics. It is not possible to define the law according to the wishes of religious organizations.