The problem with 'fast fashion'

The rise of "fast fashion" caused unexpected situations. With the decline in the quality of clothing items, the $ 4 billion second-hand clothing transactions were depleted

So where do all the clothes we do not want go? Kim Gittleson of BBC introduced the future of old clothes

Good 360 believes that the problem of fast fashion is a great opportunity to transfer items that are shipped to a landfill and otherwise sent to troubled nonprofit organizations and communities, unless otherwise. We will work with foresighted brands to extend the life of unsold clothing and recycle old clothes to useful materials. One of the main ways we can help is to donate clothes from a major retailer and tailor them to precious charity. Every year, we donate millions of dollars of clothing, such as very necessary shoes, winter wear, business wear and baby clothes, to a network of non-profit organizations.

Make the recycling economy more fashionable: Good 360 has established an important partnership with apparel companies

Fast fashion "Fast fashion" is a term used by retailers to strip clothes off the runway and expose them to the public in a short time. Fast fashion is the reason we can get fashion clothes at such a favorable price. Listening to all of these, you might think "Wow, this is a good thing." In fact, this means that people making these clothes must work for a long time to get a very low wage in adverse conditions. - President Obama has begun his state speech by serving US employees to earn minimum wages. That is wrong. "(State Council address 2013 qtd). Discussions on whether to raise the minimum wage have been taking place between the Democratic Party and the Republican Party for many years.

Vanessa Friedman of the New York Times wrote an article titled "New meaning of fast fashion" and introduced a new term to divert the true meaning of fast fashion. ) Fast fashion is far from investment, but it is not a discount negotiation. Friedman admits that there is inequality in fast fashion, but her focus is not on companies that produce them. She accused consumerism not as a waste of the problem but as an overall fast fashion phenomenon. She said that even luxury brands will be in vain for a while. She said, "Time may be luxurious, but we should not think that spending money on waste is in vain" (2017). She ignored the reason why the fast fashion company paid a price for consumption at our speed. Restricting consumption is part of ending a fashionable solution, but ignoring the authenticity of fast fashion does not eliminate fraud