The Problem of Groupthink in 12 Angry Men

The term collective thinking in this report is defined as a psychosocial phenomenon leading a group in a stressful situation. This theory of social psychology can be divided into 8 signs. A perfect fantasy, collective rationalization, belief in inherent morality, stereotyping of external groups, direct pressure on opponents, self-censorship, consistent fantasy, self-called 'thinker'. According to Irving Janis, collective thinking has three conditions.

The background of the situation includes the status of group meetings, social roles, and anticipated actions. This concept is portrayed in the movie "12 Angry Men". The purpose of this article is to examine the contents of a movie to show the symptoms of collective thinking. Collective thinking consists of eight major elements that appear at the scene of the movie, as 12 men discussed the planned murder case. As the jury talks about the destiny of young people, all these elements continue to rise. Unanimous consent in the movie

COMM 132 October 2, 2014 Film paper (12 angry people) In the movie, 12 angry people, 12 juries find a young man for the crime of murdering his own father I am at work. In order for a man to fulfill his duties as a jury, it is necessary to unite and reach an agreement to analyze the evidence and testimony of the trial. In other words, whether young people are guilty and whether the defendant is guilty or not guilty will come to an agreement. As an independent group ... "12 angry people" is a classic movie depicting how a determined leader can change the whole crowd. Through devotion, curiosity, and the pursuit of truth, he can persuade a group to guess even 12 people. This homosexual group has over a dozen different characters - some of them are leaders, but most of them are not. The most powerful leader in this movie is a white suit architect. From the first vote I am an architect