The Pro-Kingship and Anti-Kingship Debate

Samuel's parents and anti-king power patch patriarchy and anti-king argument are about Samuel's request to get the king from his people. Samuel's son did not follow his example and was a bad leader, so they felt they needed the king. Samuel met their needs by asking the king for God. Samuel hesitated about this, but he asked God anyway, and he obeyed the lawsuit at their request. In my opinion, the discussion of the power of Prince has several advantages. In the era of confusion, the king may be a good thing.

The words "king" and "king" are words of the common Bible, which appear 2,500 times in the Old Testament and 275 times in the New Testament. These terms apply not only to human rulers but also to God. Many scholars believe that the concept of God's royalty is very basic to the Bible and it is regarded as the subject of all Bible teachings. Generally, the terms melek (Heb.king) and basileus (Gk.king) refer to those with the highest authority in the country or city. In the Old Testament, references to "king" and "king" appeared in the story of the era of division of the ancient Unification Kingdom and Israel. Saul, David and Solomon were kings who ruled Israel 's unified warrior. After the death of Solomon, the kingdom was divided into northern (Israel) and southern (Judah). Then the king of Israel (19 kings) and Judah (19 kings, one queen) began in 931 BC.

Little is known about the rules governing the succession of the royalty. The common view that the heir to the throne must marry his eldest daughter has been denied; the king did not pass through the female line. The Queen 's choice seems to be free; the Queen is often the kin' s immediate family, but she may not be related to him. In the new kingdom, the evidence is rich and each king has a queen with a unique title as well as several small wives. The son of Lord Queen seems to be the successor to the heir to the throne, but other sons may become kings. In many cases, the heir is the oldest (surviving) son and this inheritance pattern is consistent with the more general Egyptian values, but in many cases he is the other relatives Or not at all.

In Hellenistic era, the Phoenicians occupied a hereditary monarchy, and the sources of Greece and Rome derive from the power of Cartago. It seems it is not genetic, but selective, in fact the family, Magnid dominated the 6th century BC. In the 5th century, the power of the monarchy weakened, this development was similar to the political evolution of Greek city state and Rome. Roman sources are translated as "judges" in the Old Testament simply by directly copying the political terminology of Carthage's sufet with the same Hebrew shofe Cart as its etymology but it just means the judicial function It is not. Perhaps at some stage in the fourth century AD, these families became political leaders of Carthage and other Western Phenician settlements. The citizen group chooses two sets every year, but all come from wealthy people.