The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration

References: Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mullow C, GøtzschePC, Ioannidis JPA, et al. (2009) PRISMA Reporting System for Evaluation and Evaluation of Meta-Analysis for Medical Intervention Studies: Interpretation and Details. PLoS Med 6 (7): e 1000 000. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100

Copyright: © 2009 Liberati et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons display licensing provisions, and unlimited use, distribution and copying on any media is possible if original author and credit are available.

Source of funding: PRISMA is funded by Canadian Institute of Health, Modeit di Modena in Italy, UK Cancer Institute, BMJ's knowledge of clinical evidence, and GlaxoSmithKline Canada. The funds for AL are partially funded by Italian universities (COFIN - PRIN 2002 prot. 2002061749 and COFIN - PRIN 2006 prot. 2006062298). DGA is funded by the UK cancer research center. DM is funded by the research director of the University of Ottawa. Sponsors did not participate in the planning, execution, or writing of PRISMA documents. Furthermore, no donor has played a role in drafting the manuscript.

Competitive interest: Employment of MC is the director of the Cochrane Center in the UK. He is employed by the Oxford Radcliffe Hospital Trust Fund representing the UK Department of Health and the National Institutes of Health. This is a deadline agreement whose renewal depends on the value of his work The Cochrane Center in England and the Cochrane Collaboration have more value for the Ministry of Health. His work includes implementation of a systematic review and support for the implementation and use of systematic reviews. Therefore, the work of systematic review like this manuscript may affect his employment.

Abbreviations: PICOS, participants, intervention, comparators, results and research design; PRISMA, priority report project for systematic review and meta-analysis; QUOROM, quality report of meta-analysis

Source: Not entrusted; external peer review. To promote the dissemination of PRISMA's explanatory documents, you can read this article for free in PLoS Medicine, Annals of Internal Medicine, and BMJ. The author shares the copyright of this article. For more details on further use please refer to the PRISMA website (http://www.prisma-statement.org/).

Our research is based on a systematic review and recommendation of meta-analytics from PRISMA (a preferred reporting project for systematic review and meta-analysis). Published occupation related to respiratory health, including families or environmental exposure tests, including chronic diseases (including diagnosis of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) and clinical symptoms (cough, dyspnea, wheezing, asthma attacks etc.) Comprehensive search The National Medical Library MEDLINE database (accessed from PubMed) performs respiratory disorders. Search is limited to research before December 2013

Our goal is to evaluate systematically peer-reviewed literature about literature being bullied, under the guidance of a systematic review and a preferred reporting program for meta-analysis (PRISMA). Given the heterogeneity of cyber-bullying measurement tools used in the included studies, I do not think that a meta-analysis to determine the overall prevalence of cyber-bullying between studies is viable. After consulting with a health librarian, I started searching from the four major databases of medical and social scientific literature (PubMed, PsycINFO, CINAHL Plus, and Web of Science) - from the beginning of 2015 to June. Finding interesting topics Because there is no medical field (MeSH), we have identified keyword search terms beginning with the term cyber bullying and extended the search to keywords related to manuscripts found in the initial search.

Morbidity rate of bullying in American high school and high school youth: systematic review and quality evaluation