The Principles of Police Leadership

All organizations, especially law enforcement agencies, need to take leadership. Maintaining a reliable leadership structure is important to the success of any organization. Modern police leadership style concepts include powerful and competitive unlimited leaders. The foundation of the police leadership is an authoritarian style based on integrity and courage, including teamwork, participation and shared leadership (Cordner & Scarborough, 2010). Such leadership works well in emergency situations and requires quick decision-making and tight control in emergency situations.

This paper analyzes change management of police organization, compares teaching methods, analyzes leaders' interpersonal skill efficiency, analyzes the role of leaders in police environments, and recognizes guiding principles, theories and methods . . In 1975, due to the reorganization of local governments, the Berg and Army police were integrated into the eight territories recognized today. Currently, Strathclyde's police have undergone extensive change management, which resulted in a variable substitution contract (VSA) at the operation level of all units.

In accordance with the "Basic Principles of Use of Armament and Gun by United Nations Law Enforcement Officers" and guidelines for the implementation of these principles in the new amnesty, the four basic principles for judging the use of power by the police are outlined There. They are legality, necessity, proportionality and accountability. In other words, is it the force for legal law enforcement purposes (eg not to protect the political interests of the regime)? What is necessary to decide how much power to use with force? Is there a balance between the benefits of use and the adverse effects that may occur after use? These principles should be used as a basis for judging tear gas attacks at Hong Kong police and other police under occupation.

Hong Kong police vomiting gas attacks in a year: punishment and many unresolved issues

One of the key principles of democratic crackdown and community crackdown is that the police should be responsible for public behavior, actions and actions and respect and protect community members' rights. These principles should be applied to the police as a whole including community police and police officers in charge of terrorism countermeasures. Terror countermeasures strategies should be distinguished from community security. The rationale for this clear division is to hinder the reality and perception of the public, secretly pursue security agenda in pretext of unity and community security outreach activities. Otherwise there is the possibility that the public's confidence in the police, especially the local police, will be compromised, which is extremely important for their effectiveness. • Policies and measures to increase the unity of the community and to resist crime

Preventing terrorism and fighting against violent extremism and radicalization leading to terrorism: community security methods