The Principle of Substituted Judgment

Traditionally, physicians should use all their abilities and training to save the lives of patients, not judging the principle. Recently the doctor 's role has been redefined to maintain patient autonomy. Now, doctors need to be there so far, and in the case of competent patients I would like to provide life saving care. Until this century, brain-dead patients rarely stay active for long periods.

Over the past three decades, in the American medical ethics, the principle of respect for patient autonomy has become increasingly important in American medical ethics and often conflicts with existing paternityist models whose doctors are patients I will. 4 (p209) Well, the pendulum swings in the opposite direction. And patient wishes are considered to be the most important. Judge Benjamin Caldozo, New York State Supreme Court, as early as 1914 states the legal basis of this view as follows. "4 (p. 73) This right is transferred to the patient's healthcare agent, and if the patient is unable to exercise the right, that right will be transferred to the close relative.

In each trial case, the presiding judge must submit to the court a sentence that summarizes his judgment and the legal basis as the basis of the judgment. In this judgment, it is necessary to consider the description of two kinds of legal principle. Incidentally, these are determinants of the ratio and the reason for the decision; by the way, by the way. It is often difficult to distinguish ratios and indicators in judgment, which causes problems for judges trying to keep the principle.