Language power If you say that I am currently working at a major oil distribution center, you think I am a very qualified person and can earn unlimited money. But the power of my language is only to say that I am working at a gas station, the minimum wage. Historic great historical figures exploit the advantages of language to exploit the power of language to encourage people to unite in common cause and change the world. Some of the most influential writers are those who appear in language recognition.
But the problem of power is actually more complicated. Especially in the case of "power of language", the problem is multilayered. "The power of words" is not only the word that demonstrates power, but also the destruction of power. Most importantly, as a language, it has a very special power. The relationship between language and power is contradictory. We call "power of language" the "language of power". The general meaning here is that all power must ultimately use the language in which it is conveyed and expressed. In other words, others just listen and obey. In a narrow sense, understanding of this "power of language" is a tool of language for exercising power. Instruction of the language itself becomes a means of power. Like political rhetorical and confusing people, like "ideology and corruption," through "linguistic temptation" to be "convincing".
Everyone speaks in different languages. Even the most proficient speakers can not monopolize the power of the language. After all, "power of language" is not in the speaker but in the language itself. The power of language belongs to the language itself. Therefore, this power belongs to everyone who owns that language. People who have acquired language skills have power. Language is not only a tool that hands over to power, it is also a reaction force that can not be restricted and suppressed. Power, such as having weapons and money, depends on many factors. These are missing; some are those who have them and others are not. This shortage establishes human power for people. It shows an ubiquitous social relationship between power and inequality