The Politics of Nationalism in Quebec

This content is available through online browsing (free) program dependent on page scan. Screen readers can not currently scan, so please contact JSTOR user support for access. We will provide PDF copy of your screen reader

Praisers praised what they thought of as Trudeau's wisdom and political insight, maintained the national unity of Quebec's sovereign movement, restrained Québec's terrorist crisis, and made Pan-Canada's identity Cultivate, and achieve comprehensive institutional reform, including the implementation of official bilingualism. Constitutional Protection and the Establishment of "Charter of Rights and Freedoms" Critics condemned him as damaging the Quebec culture and prairie economy due to arrogance, poor economic management, and excessive concentration of Canadian decisions doing. He withdrew from politics in 1984 and John Turner took over him.

During most of the 50 years, Canadian politics was asked: Quebec is a country? Should it be recognized by constitutional or other means? Discussions on the "unique society" clause of Mickey Lake and the Charlottetown Agreement from the early "special status" and "dual state" of the era of Leicester Pearson and Robert Stanfield, the parliament based on the Harper regime Until the resolution recognizes that "Quebec formed a unified country in Canada", this problem is not far from the headline.

For most Quebec politicians, whether it is sovereign or not, the question of Quebec's political position has not been solved yet. Quebec independence is a political problem, but cultural issues are also a source of independent desire. The core cultural claims of sovereignty are that sovereignty alone can fully guarantee the survival of French in North America, the Quebecs establish their own nationality, maintain their cultural identity, It is possible to maintain the existence of group memory of.