The Pluralists View on Media Ownership

Viewers' view on ownership of media Most pluralists think that masses have the ability to resist media, use media and disseminate opinions, rather than being controlled by media . We also believe that we can influence the media as they also live in "democracy" where we can decide whether to read the newspaper or BBC news. To some extent, pluralists believe that the media does not respond to the media's needs, but rather that the media meets the public needs.

Ownership of the media ranges from individual ownership to state ownership. In theory, ownership of the media can be divided into two categories. It is not subject to government control. Established laws to support independent media

Regarding the role of media in the current political situation, there are two main points. It is pluralism and Marxism. People who support pluralist views believe that the media will carry out two basic tasks: "(1) it inform the public, (2) it acts as a supervisor of power" (Edkins and Zehfuss 157). - Binding of the media: formation of television and movies and formation of society. "Hollywood, a great mythologist, tells people what to think about gays, and how gay people think about themselves." - Vito Russo Media is a society with the power to change our world It is a mirror of institutional and cultural values. Descriptions of different groups and identities in television and movies alleviate social phobia and hatred by ignorance

The pluralistic concept of freedom of speech involves accepting various views, even if they morally wrong, support incorrect claims, promote prejudice and discrimination. In a society where there is more than one freedom of speech, arguing will be argued when saying foolishness, ignorance, or retreat. However, it does not exist in environments where it is difficult to spit out such things. You will not be rejected by society, dismissed, threatened by death or rape, stolen by social media, or destroyed with a successful career or a successful career. Instead, as your position is separate from you, if the law is institutionalized, just because your position is wrong, or it is harmful to others, It is not considered a threat.