The Paradox of Dominate Ideologies in the Fight of Social Justice.

Art is used in the mass media to influence people, especially the people of our lives and cultures of contemporary times. In our culture, most young artists are acquired through a particularly popular cultural network like TV and MTV. An MTV television program called The Hills is an example of a program that advertises mainstream ideologies to young children and young people. A little different from this is another show called MTV at Jersey Coast. This is an example of a show that partially strengthens the dominant ideology of the same type of audience and partially challenges it.

The mainstream worldview of many institutions today is basically environmentally friendly equality and relativism. The green paradox is that it is open but as I mentioned in an interview with Deep Code's Jordan Greenhall in my recent documentary "Glitch in the Matrix", it is actually immersed in ideology It is. As you can see, the left is in trouble. Open ideology, not opening itself. As founder of the model, Don Beck and Christopher Cowan says: "As points become more powerful and disappear from our eyes we can see for the first time the validity of all the human systems that have woken up to date.These systems are designed to ensure that health is consistent with the overall It contributes to viability and, therefore, contributes to the continuation of life itself, it is regarded as dynamic force.

Asymmetry of ideology Contrary to the theory of social rule that the social dominance system is more dominant than the subordinates, much of the psychological and ideological forces that help to maintain control are for the dominant individuals Is more effective than subordinate group. For example, although legalization of an enhanced hierarchy affects the actions of a dominant subordinate, recognizing it is often easier for those who rule the group (eg Sidanius & Pratto, 1999, Ch.4) . In addition, for the dominant group, the feeling that the SDO is more consistent with her status (eg Pratto, 1999), the motivation for group and system defense is consistent (eg Jost & Burgess, 2000). I conflict. Top groups such as countries, and attachments to other groups such as the country (Sidanius, Feshbach, Levin, and Pratto, 1997)

By controlling or participating in a series of attitudes, behaviors, social structures, and ideologies to dominate the dominant group strengths, these attitudes, behaviors, social structures, and ideologies are the power and privilege of the dominant group And limit the advantages of the suppressed group itself. . As with systematic racism, it is embodied in at least four aspects: internalized racial discrimination affects the inner life of colored people. Because by definition the race is a social and political structure based on the history / experience of the oppressor-suppression-related physical features, it provides a very limited self-awareness for people in color. With internalized racial discrimination, this limited self-recognition weakens the people's faith in our human race and weakens our understanding of our inner life. This appears in various forms. In particular,