The Outcome of Outcome Based Luck

According to Thomas Nagel's revolutionary but problematic theory, one person will never assume the true responsibility. Philosophers believe that there is power out of our self restraint that can influence our moral standards. These forces are called moral luck. In the eyes of Nagel there are four different types of moral luck. Constant luck, luck in my case, and luck with luck and luck.

Nagel's "moral luck" category deals with the case of indirect luck. Occasional results may affect past behavior and personality judgment. Different results produce different judgments, and people in # 2 receive a free pass for what they actually can not control. Since history only happens once, there is no other way to compare possible situations. Of course, historians and writers may provide an anti-factual model. But how likely is people to feel angry when they see them? Rather, people say, "Why are you worried about the possibilities of abstraction, there are many practical problems in focusing on yourself?"

Outcome thinkers really discovered and offered a few people to achieve the results they wanted, in solving the real problem. As a result, products built by philosophers may reverse business, increase revenue, halve costs, make people happy, save people, contacts, or someone else may think of results. Hmm. They make the results the cornerstone of their thinking and decision making, so they find and provide these things. Erron Musk is a good example of results thinkers. He did not build SpaceX. It was because I was able to land the rocket again (technical thinking). He did not build SpaceX to solve the expensive satellite transmission problem (thinking about the problem). He is constructing SpaceX to achieve the result (result of thought) of making human a Mars and human being a cosmic species. As a result, what the thinkers build will intentionally change the world in the way they want to change. The best product manager is the results thinker

As a result, the philosopher has the most rigorous and accurate definition of "build the right thing". It is one that achieves the desired result. Of course, in order to achieve the desired result, people have to solve real problems and build something feasible. Therefore, what an outcome thinker defines as "correct" is a special subset, although it is different from a technical thinker or a problem thinker. Outcome thinkers really discovered and offered a few people to achieve the results they wanted, in solving the real problem. As a result, products built by philosophers may reverse business, increase revenue, halve costs, make people happy, save people, contacts, or someone else may think of results. Hmm. They make the results the cornerstone of their thinking and decision making, so they find and provide these things.