The Optimistic Philosophy in "Candide" by Voltaire Essay

Why are good people having bad things? There are things that are often asked. This is a common question, philosophers and religious people try to answer for centuries, but no one can find the answer. Frankly, there is no doubt that Voltaire answered the answer given by some philosophers of his time. The philosophy being discussed throughout the novel gives meaning to the story itself and continues to contribute through stories.

In the baron castle somewhere in Germany, the hero lived for a short time. Pangloss is a philosopher and teacher of the Baron children, has a fundamental philosophy of life and communicates it to students. This idea will not help them ... See more

Offering a brief explanation of Pangloss' s optimistic philosophy, we live in "the best world" that appears in the first chapter of the story and sets the theme through the novel. It does not make sense, but it is basically the logic behind Panglos philosophy. Obviously, the glasses are designed to fit the nose. This is the first of many very illogical arguments that favor his philosophy. Along with the development of the novel, unfortunately this philosophy has been attacked by unfortunate encounters, but these characters will come across again and again throughout their lifetimes. It also establishes an endless debate between optimistic and pessimistic views. Voltaire proved the point using Pangloss' s philosophy. Because he is strongly opposed to this philosophy, this is a theme that appears repeatedly in the novel.

The optimistic view is also the main example of Voltaire's satire in the novel, which may be the purpose of writing a novel. This can be explained by his reply to the philosopher at the time. Especially von Leibniz. Leibnitz insists that we live in every possible world, not God is perfect, kind and omnipotent, so we are not creating an imperfect world. Leibniz also said evil is

As early as 1759, Voltaire announced and completed Candide, or Opti Optimisme (Candide, or optimism). Leibniz 's optimistic irony of philosophical philosophy is still Voltaire's most famous work. For the remaining 20 years, he will stay at the price while entertaining VIPs such as James Boswell, Adams Miss, Giacomo Casanova, Edward Gibbon etc. In 1764 he published a series of articles on Christianity's history and doctrine, one of his most famous philosophical works, Dictionnaire philosophy. Some of them were originally written in Berlin.

In his novel "Candide", Voltaire attacked Candide's two-dimensional view of life using sarcasm, depiction, exaggeration, and contrast techniques and refuted the overly optimistic philosophy presented by Candide and Pangloss. The experience of Candide and Pangloss brought about a big contradiction with this philosophy, but both chose to maintain their beliefs in this regard. Voltaire used Candide as a tool to blame out all aspects of his spirit of the times. Through his technique he attacked multiple perspectives and further attacked his enlightenment. Candide is a story about the two dimensional character of Candide. And that person was taught from the moment of being born to accept the ideals of others, without thinking for himself. He chose to follow the local philosopher Pangloss. And that person preached that everything is okay, the world is "the best among all possible worlds"

The irony of Voltaire's Candide Voltaire used satire well to convey his view on life. Among his novel "Kandide" Voltaire satires the philosophy of philosopher Libniz and claims that this is the best among all possible worlds. Novel, eternal optimism, childish role, Candid travels all over the world, but at least there are various experiences to prove that evil exists to the reader. - Politically inaccurate Candide Candide is a classic story to be added to every classical literature. This is a story to deal with the problem of mankind who chose to ignore other stories. It includes humanity, optimism, religion and national issues. These elements provide the insight and prospect that readers will not enter daily literary works. These factors are controversial, but from a sincere perspective